<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making technology vs. using technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/20091118/making-technology-vs-using-technology/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/productivity/making-technology-vs-using-technology</link>
	<description>with Alexandra Samuel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Barcode</title>
		<link>http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/productivity/making-technology-vs-using-technology#comment-197894</link>
		<dc:creator>Barcode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 20:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/?p=6825#comment-197894</guid>
		<description>Nice post, thanks for the share of this information. No one to choose among the two. Everyone should be responsible in using the technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, thanks for the share of this information. No one to choose among the two. Everyone should be responsible in using the technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barcode</title>
		<link>http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/productivity/making-technology-vs-using-technology#comment-197737</link>
		<dc:creator>Barcode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 13:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/?p=6825#comment-197737</guid>
		<description>Nice post, thanks for the share of this information. No one to choose among the two. Everyone should be responsible in using the technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, thanks for the share of this information. No one to choose among the two. Everyone should be responsible in using the technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Lowry</title>
		<link>http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/productivity/making-technology-vs-using-technology#comment-188010</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Lowry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/?p=6825#comment-188010</guid>
		<description>Nice to read this blog post reframing the question of making—our lunch conversation—in relation to how we work with or on technology.  
I&#039;ve continued thinking about your idea to bring artists and bloggers together and about my concern about the time and space of these meetings. I argued that what most working artists do involves a radically different sense of material process than that most generally associated with making art—object-based studio practice. I suggested that it would be pretty hard to get a sense of their creative practice by visiting many artists in the studio. I recalled how Kathleen Ritter pointed our, in relation to her VAG exhibition How Soon is Now (http://www.vanartgallery.bc.ca/the_exhibitions/exhibit_how_soon_is_now.html), that the &quot;studio visit&quot; now tends to happen in a coffee shop with artist and curator gathered around a laptop. 
The distinction I&#039;m interested in following involves an extended understanding of practice that sees the studio not as the primary locus of artistic production (art making) but as a node in a wider network or temporal-spatial matrix that includes many social actors—individuals and institutions. This is a point your post focuses for me: that is, how new digital media are at the crux of this shift in art practices, and how our relation to software (social software in particular) might function as both a mode of creative practice and metaphor for the investigation of these changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to read this blog post reframing the question of making—our lunch conversation—in relation to how we work with or on technology.<br />
I&#8217;ve continued thinking about your idea to bring artists and bloggers together and about my concern about the time and space of these meetings. I argued that what most working artists do involves a radically different sense of material process than that most generally associated with making art—object-based studio practice. I suggested that it would be pretty hard to get a sense of their creative practice by visiting many artists in the studio. I recalled how Kathleen Ritter pointed our, in relation to her VAG exhibition How Soon is Now (<a href="http://www.vanartgallery.bc.ca/the_exhibitions/exhibit_how_soon_is_now.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.vanartgallery.bc.ca/the_exhibitions/exhibit_how_soon_is_now.html</a>), that the &#8220;studio visit&#8221; now tends to happen in a coffee shop with artist and curator gathered around a laptop.<br />
The distinction I&#8217;m interested in following involves an extended understanding of practice that sees the studio not as the primary locus of artistic production (art making) but as a node in a wider network or temporal-spatial matrix that includes many social actors—individuals and institutions. This is a point your post focuses for me: that is, how new digital media are at the crux of this shift in art practices, and how our relation to software (social software in particular) might function as both a mode of creative practice and metaphor for the investigation of these changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Lowry</title>
		<link>http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/productivity/making-technology-vs-using-technology#comment-198514</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Lowry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/?p=6825#comment-198514</guid>
		<description>Nice to read this blog post reframing the question of making—our lunch conversation—in relation to how we work with or on technology.  
I&#039;ve continued thinking about your idea to bring artists and bloggers together and about my concern about the time and space of these meetings. I argued that what most working artists do involves a radically different sense of material process than that most generally associated with making art—object-based studio practice. I suggested that it would be pretty hard to get a sense of their creative practice by visiting many artists in the studio. I recalled how Kathleen Ritter pointed our, in relation to her VAG exhibition How Soon is Now (http://www.vanartgallery.bc.ca/the_exhibitions/exhibit_how_soon_is_now.html), that the &quot;studio visit&quot; now tends to happen in a coffee shop with artist and curator gathered around a laptop. 
The distinction I&#039;m interested in following involves an extended understanding of practice that sees the studio not as the primary locus of artistic production (art making) but as a node in a wider network or temporal-spatial matrix that includes many social actors—individuals and institutions. This is a point your post focuses for me: that is, how new digital media are at the crux of this shift in art practices, and how our relation to software (social software in particular) might function as both a mode of creative practice and metaphor for the investigation of these changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to read this blog post reframing the question of making—our lunch conversation—in relation to how we work with or on technology.<br />
I&#8217;ve continued thinking about your idea to bring artists and bloggers together and about my concern about the time and space of these meetings. I argued that what most working artists do involves a radically different sense of material process than that most generally associated with making art—object-based studio practice. I suggested that it would be pretty hard to get a sense of their creative practice by visiting many artists in the studio. I recalled how Kathleen Ritter pointed our, in relation to her VAG exhibition How Soon is Now (<a href="http://www.vanartgallery.bc.ca/the_exhibitions/exhibit_how_soon_is_now.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.vanartgallery.bc.ca/the_exhibitions/exhibit_how_soon_is_now.html</a>), that the &#8220;studio visit&#8221; now tends to happen in a coffee shop with artist and curator gathered around a laptop.<br />
The distinction I&#8217;m interested in following involves an extended understanding of practice that sees the studio not as the primary locus of artistic production (art making) but as a node in a wider network or temporal-spatial matrix that includes many social actors—individuals and institutions. This is a point your post focuses for me: that is, how new digital media are at the crux of this shift in art practices, and how our relation to software (social software in particular) might function as both a mode of creative practice and metaphor for the investigation of these changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mia</title>
		<link>http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/productivity/making-technology-vs-using-technology#comment-187950</link>
		<dc:creator>Mia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/?p=6825#comment-187950</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing this. I agree that it is a continuum, most of us &#039;tinker&#039; at least from time to time with our technology - particularly when we are forced to find a new way of doing something, or forced to repair some broken program.

My mother (in her 40&#039;s) has only learned how to do very basic things with computers in the last few years, like send an email. Her parents have also recently bought a computer and are learning how to use it. I am impressed with how much they have worked out by themselves without needing help from one of their kids or grandkids.  I guess the same is true for me - I get my dad to &quot;fix&quot; many things on my computer if he is around, but if he is not, I usually figure it out myself. Rcently my laptop has got  several virus threats and has crashed  - I searched forums online and did a bunch of things I have never done before (like starting up my laptop on safe mode). I managed to fix whatever was going wrong with my laptop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this. I agree that it is a continuum, most of us &#8216;tinker&#8217; at least from time to time with our technology &#8211; particularly when we are forced to find a new way of doing something, or forced to repair some broken program.</p>
<p>My mother (in her 40&#8242;s) has only learned how to do very basic things with computers in the last few years, like send an email. Her parents have also recently bought a computer and are learning how to use it. I am impressed with how much they have worked out by themselves without needing help from one of their kids or grandkids.  I guess the same is true for me &#8211; I get my dad to &#8220;fix&#8221; many things on my computer if he is around, but if he is not, I usually figure it out myself. Rcently my laptop has got  several virus threats and has crashed  &#8211; I searched forums online and did a bunch of things I have never done before (like starting up my laptop on safe mode). I managed to fix whatever was going wrong with my laptop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mia</title>
		<link>http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/productivity/making-technology-vs-using-technology#comment-198513</link>
		<dc:creator>Mia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/?p=6825#comment-198513</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing this. I agree that it is a continuum, most of us &#039;tinker&#039; at least from time to time with our technology - particularly when we are forced to find a new way of doing something, or forced to repair some broken program.

My mother (in her 40&#039;s) has only learned how to do very basic things with computers in the last few years, like send an email. Her parents have also recently bought a computer and are learning how to use it. I am impressed with how much they have worked out by themselves without needing help from one of their kids or grandkids.  I guess the same is true for me - I get my dad to &quot;fix&quot; many things on my computer if he is around, but if he is not, I usually figure it out myself. Rcently my laptop has got  several virus threats and has crashed  - I searched forums online and did a bunch of things I have never done before (like starting up my laptop on safe mode). I managed to fix whatever was going wrong with my laptop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this. I agree that it is a continuum, most of us &#8216;tinker&#8217; at least from time to time with our technology &#8211; particularly when we are forced to find a new way of doing something, or forced to repair some broken program.</p>
<p>My mother (in her 40&#8242;s) has only learned how to do very basic things with computers in the last few years, like send an email. Her parents have also recently bought a computer and are learning how to use it. I am impressed with how much they have worked out by themselves without needing help from one of their kids or grandkids.  I guess the same is true for me &#8211; I get my dad to &#8220;fix&#8221; many things on my computer if he is around, but if he is not, I usually figure it out myself. Rcently my laptop has got  several virus threats and has crashed  &#8211; I searched forums online and did a bunch of things I have never done before (like starting up my laptop on safe mode). I managed to fix whatever was going wrong with my laptop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Call Center Services Outsourcing</title>
		<link>http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/productivity/making-technology-vs-using-technology#comment-187864</link>
		<dc:creator>Call Center Services Outsourcing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/?p=6825#comment-187864</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039; m somewhere between tinkerer and hacker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217; m somewhere between tinkerer and hacker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Call Center Services Outsourci</title>
		<link>http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/productivity/making-technology-vs-using-technology#comment-198512</link>
		<dc:creator>Call Center Services Outsourci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexandrasamuel.com/?p=6825#comment-198512</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039; m somewhere between tinkerer and hacker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217; m somewhere between tinkerer and hacker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

